Mezhepler Tarihi: Muhammed Ebu Zehra. 1 like. Book. Mezhepler Tarihi. Prof. Dr. Muhammed Ebu Zehra. Mezhepler Tarihi – Prof. Dr. Muhammed Ebu Zehra. Category: Religious. Description. MUHAMMED EBU ZEHRA, ÝSLÂMDA SIYASÎ VE ÝTIKADÎ MEZHEPLER TARIHI (A HISTORY OF POLITICAL AND THEOLOGICAL SCHOOLS IN ISLAM)
|Published (Last):||20 June 2008|
|PDF File Size:||9.60 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.99 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
What are the reasons of the difference in views about Islamic issues?
Bayburt University Lifelong Learning Programme
In addition, there are the ones who are stupid, whose hearts are blind and confused. Thus the issue which is seen as two sided is understood and it is seen that they do not contradict one another.
Some blind reach the place of an elephant. So, Man wills and God creates.
So everyone takes the statements of the one he imitates as the truth; thus, the disagreements in history continue without changing. Otherwise, it may be thought that everyone says the truth at the first glance; but in reality the conclusion they reach is defective and lacking.
Iğdır University Lifelong Learning Programme
This being the case, people growing up in different environments will show differences. Most often, the disagreements arise not because the issues are unclear or hard to comprehend, but because each side of the disagreement does not know the view of the other. Wherever there is blind conviction, it is just natural that excessive disagreements exist, because the mentality of imitation kills the objective reasoning and causes the minds to become dim.
And in the end, their conclusions will be different in the same issues. Abu Zahra says that in the letters of the institution Ihvanussafa these are related about this issue: This is one of the reasons why the learned differed in their views and sects.
Skip to main content. Disagreements arise because everyone has different desires, interests, and dispositions.
There are very different groups of jobs. If looked into as a whole, not separately, the truth will be better understood. Besides the factor of creation, the other factors having effect in this matter are shortly as tarihk The fact that the issues that are open to disagreement are actually unclear: Every person penetrates into an aspect of the truth.
As their understanding and capacities differ, their views and beliefs differ likewise.
İ SLÂ MDA FIKHİ MEZHEPLER TARİ Hİ M. EBU ZEHRA.
So, each group of job will proceed in accordance with their principles. This kind of a desire leads someone to the conviction that what he says is the ultimate truth and the opposite views are absolutely wrong.
For example, while it is mentioned in the Koran about the free will of the human, it is also stated that all kinds of will and power are peculiar to God. For this reason, Socrates says, If ttarihi thing upon which disagreement exits is known, every disagreement stops.
Wherever is human there is disagreement, because this is part of the characteristics of human. Log in Create new account Random Question. For this reason, the matter will be better understood if all the verses about the issue are looked into.
As is seen, each of them understood just one part of the truth, declared their friends wrong, and claimed that they are mistaken in the understanding of the truth.
About this issue, Spinoza says, What shows us the matter beautiful is our desires and tendencies. If I may put it this way, as it is better to look at the elephant and depict it as a whole; it is also better to look at the verses of the Koran as a whole. I want to ask a question. So, even if they are wrong, he insists on his views. Therefore; while there are verses supporting the Mutazile who says that people create their own deeds and that God has no intervention in the deeds of His slaves; there are also verses supporting the Cebriyye who says that people have no will and that they are like leaves in the wind against the will of God.
The one who grabs one of its legs says that this is a long and round animal similar to a trunk of a tree.
One of the reasons of the disagreement is the imitation of the old; because imitation causes blind and faulty conviction.